Showing posts with label Chris Anderson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Anderson. Show all posts

Friday, October 7, 2016

Links

Exploring the latticework: Some reflections and a list of around 100 cross-disciplinary mental models - by Chetan Parikh (LINK)

Mars Buys Out Buffett Preferred Stake That Paid 5% Dividend (LINK)

Ray Dalio's Remarks at the 40th Annual Central Banking Seminar [H/T Barry Ritholtz] (LINK)

The Howard Marks Investor Series at The Wharton School: A Conversation with Stephen A. Schwarzman (video from April 2016) [H/T ValueConferences] (LINK)

Deutsche Bank: A Greek Tragedy at a German Institution? - by Aswath Damodaran (LINK)

Flash crash sees the pound gyrate in Asian trading (LINK)

The Most Overlooked Trait of Investing Success - by Morgan Housel (LINK)

MailChimp and the Un-Silicon Valley Way to Make It as a Start-Up [H/T @BaseHitInvestor] (LINK)

Theranos Retreats From Blood Tests (LINK)
Company led by Elizabeth Holmes will shut down facilities and shed more than 40% of its workforce
Behind The Crash Of 3D Robotics, North America's Most Promising Drone Company (LINK)

Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen explains how AI will change the world [H/T Barry Ritholtz] (LINK)

Exponent podcast: Episode 091 — Google’s New Business Model (LINK)

Seth Godin: Do what you're good at, or... (LINK)

The Cato chronicles, part VI: the legacy (LINK)
Related book: Rome's Last Citizen: The Life and Legacy of Cato, Mortal Enemy of Caesar

Friday, September 28, 2012

Friday, April 27, 2012

The Man Who Makes the Future: Wired Icon Marc Andreessen

Found via The Big Picture.


Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Business Insider Interview with Chris Anderson

Prior to joining Wired as its Editor-in-Chief, Chris Anderson swore to himself that he would never become a journalist. Why? Because his parents were also journalists.

So he went and got a degree in physics and a job at Los Alamos.

In the end, his lineage won out and he ended up working for the journals Nature and Science before moving on to The Economist. Then, in 2000, Chris Anderson was recruited by Conde Nast to run its technology magazine Wired. Anderson's reign at Wired started off shaky, but he notes that in retrospect, the end of the dot com bubble was the best time for him to take over the magazine.

"I was able to screw up because in those days you could not succeed in that environment," Anderson told us. "So, if you're going to fail, fail in an environment where it's impossible to succeed."

Anderson made a bet that the Internet would continue to grow despite the stock market crashing, and time and time again he had his magazine declare the Internet had become ubiquitous. No one believed this positive spin however; so, the magazine had to do something different.

"Eventually, it was science that saved us," Anderson declared.

With 18 months of experience under his belt as Wired's Editor-in-Chief, Anderson released an issue of the magazine that strayed away from technology and focused on the cultural differences between science and religion. This issue served as the launching pad for Wired's longstanding dominance in the technology magazine industry.

Today, Chris Anderson is still Editor-in-Chief of Wired, a best-selling author, and the founder of a robot-manufacturing company. And he has 5 kids.

Our exclusive 40-minute interview with Chris Anderson in presented in its entirety below. We'll also publish highlights from it over the next few days.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

A world of hits

Ever-increasing choice was supposed to mean the end of the blockbuster. It has had the opposite effect

NOVEMBER 20th saw the return of an old phenomenon: the sold-out cinema. “New Moon”, a tale of vampires, werewolves and the women who love them, earned more in a single day at the American box office than any film in history. The record may not stand for long: next month “Avatar”, a three-dimensional action movie thick with special effects, will be released (see picture). This film’s production budget is reportedly $230m, which would make it one of the most expensive movies ever made. “Avatar” will be a great disappointment if its worldwide ticket sales fail to exceed $500m. Yet it is a reflection of how things are changing in the media business that such an outcome is unlikely.

There has never been so much choice in entertainment. Last year 610 films were released in America, up from 471 in 1999. Cable and satellite television are growing quickly, supplying more channels to more people across the world. More than half of all pay-television subscribers now live in the Asia-Pacific region. Online video is exploding: every minute about 20 hours’ worth of content is added to YouTube. The internet has greatly expanded choice in music and books. Yet the ever-increasing supply of content tailored to every taste seems not to have dented the appeal of the blockbuster. Quite the opposite.

This is not what was predicted by one of the most influential business books of the past few years. In “The Long Tail”, Chris Anderson, editor-in-chief of Wired, a technology magazine (and before that a journalist at The Economist), argued that demand for media was moving inexorably from the head of the distribution curve to the tail. That is, the few products that sell a lot were losing market share to the great many that sell modestly. By cutting storage and distribution costs, the internet was overturning the tyranny of the shop shelf, which had limited consumers’ choices. And, by developing software that analysed and predicted consumers’ tastes, companies like Amazon were encouraging people to wallow in esoterica. Such companies did not just supply niche markets—they helped create them.

“The Long Tail” set off a lively debate. Professors at Harvard Business School questioned whether many companies can profit from selling a little of a great many things. The supply of obscure films and music seems to be growing faster than people are discovering them. Harvard’s Anita Elberse argued in an article last year that only a foolish firm would shift its focus away from the mass market. People in the media business, who have to back their judgments with money, have a different view. In a sense, they say, both Mr Anderson and his detractors are right. At the same time, both are missing the real story.

“Both the hits and the tail are doing well,” says Jeff Bewkes, the head of Time Warner, an American media giant. Audiences are at once fragmenting into niches and consolidating around blockbusters. Of course, media consumption has not risen much over the years, so something must be losing out. That something is the almost but not quite popular content that occupies the middle ground between blockbusters and niches. The stuff that people used to watch or listen to largely because there was little else on is increasingly being ignored.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Malcolm Gladwell's critical review of FREE and Chris Anderson's response

I'm a fan of both Malcolm Gladwell and Chris Anderson, so this exchange is pretty interesting to me. Links to:



....................


Related previous post: Chris Anderson's FREE Speech

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Upfront and Unscripted with Jeff Bezos (Audio)

I think Jeff Bezos and Chris Anderson are two of the best people from which to learn. I don't know how I missed this podcast the first time, but it is really great (in my opinion). I also think the iPod-like comparison is a valid one for The Kindle. A quote I enjoyed from Bezos: "You have to have a willingness to be misunderstood if you're going to pioneer."
-
-
....................
-
-
Previous Bezos posts/links:
-
-
Previous Anderson posts/links:
-
Article: "The Long Tail" by Chris Anderson
-
The Long Tail: Book and Audio Book
-
-